Marcus Rashford remains unavailable with a hip injury, and Manchester United have given no return date ahead of the Liverpool match.

Return date remains unclear
Manchester United haven’t given a timeline for Marcus Rashford’s return from a hip injury, leaving his availability for the coming fixtures uncertain. As of Wednesday 11 November, the Fantasy Premier League app lists him at 0% to play the next game and gives his return date as unknown; that status has been in place since 20 October. The app’s estimate isn’t a club medical update, but it reflects how little is publicly established about his readiness. For supporters and fantasy managers, the practical point is simple: there’s no confirmed date to plan around.
A lingering hip issue
Sky Sports reported on 21 September that United had been managing Rashford’s hip problem since the World Cup. He was seen limping after coming off during the 1-1 draw at Fulham the previous day. The club hasn’t since announced when he might be ready to play again, leaving a long gap between the visible problem and any public indication of a return plan.
A player’s absence can involve more than waiting for pain to settle. In general, a return to match action depends on whether the player can train, handle the demands of football, and build enough fitness to contribute. Those are ordinary considerations in injury management, not details United have confirmed about Rashford’s specific case. Without an update from the club, it would be guesswork to say which stage he’s reached.
The uncertainty also makes the length of the absence difficult to interpret. A quiet period doesn’t, by itself, show whether the injury has worsened, improved, or simply hasn’t prompted a new public statement. That distinction matters: an unknown return date is a statement about what’s been communicated, not proof of a particular medical outlook. For now, the available information supports caution, not a confident forecast.
Liverpool looks a difficult target
Rashford’s current status makes a start away to Liverpool on Sunday 22 November look unlikely. A player who’s been out for weeks would typically need time to build up in training before returning to a demanding match, and there’s no indication from United that he’s close to that point. The fixture is therefore a difficult target to treat as realistic on the information available, even though no formal decision about his selection has been announced.
That’s more significant than it looks. A return to the squad, if it happens, wouldn’t automatically mean Rashford is ready to start or play a full match. Clubs often have to weigh training progress against the demands of the next fixture, and a player’s role can be limited while fitness is rebuilt. In this case, though, there’s no confirmed training update to show that United are approaching that decision.
Brentford at Old Trafford on Saturday 28 November could be a more realistic target, followed by an away game against Newcastle on Wednesday 2 December. Those dates give more time than the Liverpool match, but they’re possibilities, not confirmed return points. Rushing back before he’s ready could leave United facing another early substitution. And yet, without a club update, even the more distant fixtures remain speculation rather than a reliable schedule.
For readers tracking the situation, the useful signal will be a concrete change in what United say or in Rashford’s availability for training and selection. A fixture date on its own doesn’t establish that he’ll be ready. The gap between “could return” and “available to play” is where the uncertainty sits. That’s the part most likely to matter as the next matches approach.
Fantasy impact
Rashford is owned by 0.9% of FPL squads, so his absence is unlikely to affect many managers directly. The deadline for the next gameweek is Saturday 21 November at 11:00 UK time. Managers making a decision before then have to work with the listed 0% chance and unknown return date, rather than a confirmed medical timetable.
That small ownership figure limits the wider fantasy impact, but it doesn’t make the information irrelevant to everyone. Managers who do own him still face the familiar choice between holding a player whose return is unclear and using a transfer elsewhere. The source provides no basis for calculating which option is better; that depends on each squad and the manager’s priorities. The immediate fact is narrower: there’s no confirmed return date to anchor the decision.
If you’re working through your team before the deadline, treat the app status as a snapshot, not a promise about what will happen next. A later update could change the picture, while silence leaves the uncertainty intact. No confirmed timetable. That’s an unsatisfying answer for anyone planning a lineup, but it’s the most accurate one available here.
What the uncertainty means for United
For United, the lack of a public timeline leaves supporters unable to judge whether Rashford might contribute to the upcoming run of fixtures. The same uncertainty complicates any outside assessment of the squad: the player’s potential availability is relevant, but the available information doesn’t establish when he can return or what role he could take. It’s better to separate those questions than to treat a possible date as a likely selection.
There’s also a limit to what fixture-by-fixture speculation can tell us. Naming Liverpool, Brentford and Newcastle gives the discussion useful reference points, but it doesn’t add medical evidence. Until United provide an update, each match remains a scheduling possibility rather than a forecast of Rashford’s recovery. The clearest reading is still the plain one: his return date is unknown, and his availability for the coming fixtures hasn’t been confirmed.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.